以下是你发的4个提问,共3段,翻译的不好请指正。
PARA ONE
Personally, I think that, because of the differences in cultures, histories and ideologies between China and foreign countries, their journalism and education inevitably bear the above features.
However, they have similarities, too. From the perspective of historiography, if we look back on Chinese and American journalism, it is easy to find out that they both have gone through the similar development orbits. For instance, their newspapers have experienced three historical stages of development: remark newspapers (standpoint newspapers in China) → political party newspapers → business newspapers (commercial newspapers in China).
Furthermore, education has its universal law, and journalism as an independent subject with very strong practicality is the same in both the two countries with no lacks of comparison.
On the other hand, China's and America's journalism also have the very prodigious differences and their education respectively has their own features.
In America journalism is subjected to economy, while in China it is subjected doubly by economy and politics.
Speaking of the economy-journalism relations, in America journalism is industrialized, and in China mass media is also marketizing, but actually different from that of the US.
The journalism in China is different in form, but is suspected of taking over that of the US in its content.
From the viewpoint of academic history of journalism, the systems, views and methods of some journalism works kept identical with those of America on the whole.
To compare Chinese and Amercian journalism education, to explain detailly and objectively the culture , history and ideology which it relies on, will benefit us directly in estimating the feasibility if its method to be applied in China.
PARA TWO
The perspective and content by which things can be compared are very complicated.
Speaking of the connotation of this thesis, politics, society and culture background of the objects under study are different, so making the objects under study comparable is the basic premise.
Therefore, first it’s essential that we set the range of time of the thesis from the end of 1970s’ and the beginning of 1980s’ until now.
After 1978, freeed itself from the standstill dilemma of the Culture Revolution, Chinese education begun to revive and develop gradually; almost simultaneously (1982-1994) mass media in the US developed quickly, employees increased 40%, which, too, stimulated the development of journalism education.
Only by ascertaining the study in this specific scope of time, the comparison is comparable, reliable and effective.
Then it’s nessasary that we define the specific content and criteria of the comparison, such as training target, professional standard, curriculum set-up, teaching approach, education investment, governmental adjustment and control, the profiling of students and faculty, employment, other education forms and characteristics and so on.
This study focuses on the above integrated standard, identical comparison items and scope throughout the process of comparison.
Only when the both parties are comparable, and when they can be examined and estimated according to mutual standard, it’s possible that we make the study meaningful.
PARA THREE
Secondly, data collection and detailed desription.
Speaking of this thesis, data collection includes reference to documents, investigation and interview, symposium, examination on the spot and so on.
In order to reflect the objests under study comprehensively and objectively,
In the meantime, it’s necessary that the researchers be aware to select the data which are representative and convincing to make our reseaching target of comparison between Chinese and American journalism education phenomena meaningful and effective.
And by integrating the researching activities, making method scientific and statistics and measurement accurate, it’s ensured that the conclusion we get be correct and all the data be true and reliable.
Thirdly, seeing that journalism education is complicated itself, and the factors confined journalism education are of great quantity, it’s necessary that after the acquisition of large numbers of comparable data on Chinese and Amercian journalism edcation, we use the viewpoints and knownledge from mass media, pedagogy, pedagogical psychology, sociology, culturology,and political economics to explain and analyze, categorize them, and classify them into different types, so as to compare them comprehensively and multi-dimensionally surrounded the thesis, classify and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American journalism education, explain the origin of the similarities and differences between the two countries and make comprehensive analyses using dialetical and relative viewpoints.
Forthly, on the basis that similarities and differences are analyzed carefully, the journalism education of both countries are estimated comprehensively, essential law of education phenomenon is further explored.
Because of the difference in the way of thinking, it’s likely that different deduction and explanation can be made.
Every study inevitably has it’s ambiguities, so in the process of data research, cause and effect analysis and comparison estimation, this thesis tries carry out the study conscientiously.
温馨提示:内容为网友见解,仅供参考