急急急！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！高手帮忙翻译一下
Adding to the ridership doubts is the fact thatCalifornia’s cities, likeFlorida’s, are sprawling.
Without a car, it’s not easy to get from one place to the next. The Reason Foundation report notes
That ‘the San Francisco urban (urbanized) area’s transit market share is 3.8%, Los Angeles is 1.6%,San Diego 1.2%,San Jose 0.8% and Sacramento 0.7%,’ which means that “the overwhelming majority of HSR trips are likely to require a car at one or both ends to complete the trip in a reasonable time and with reasonable comfort..”
Other setbacks came in January, when the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, the legislature’s nonpartisan watchdog, issued an evaluation of the High Speed Rail Authority’s most recent business plan. It found the following:
1.The rail plan offered an “uninformative timeline” and presented an “inconsistent order of events.”
2.The rail plan contained “no risk management strategy.”For instance, it addressed “the risk of incorrectly forecasted ridership with one sentence,” murkily noting that “the risk “would be mitigated by policies that continue to draw people to reside inCalifornia and encourage high-speed rail as an alternative mode of transportation .’”
3.The rail plan did not “provide any numerical ranges nor confidence intervals for projections contained in the plan (such as cost, revenues, or ridership).”Thus , “the risk of not realizing the forecasted ridership, revenues ,or costs is unknown
Without a car, it’s not easy to get from one place to the next.
没有车，这是不容易从一个地方到下一个。
The Reason Foundation report notesThat ‘the San Francisco urban (urbanized) area’s transit market share is 3.8%, Los Angeles is 1.6%,San Diego 1.2%,San Jose 0.8% and Sacramento 0.7%,’ which means that “the overwhelming majority of HSR trips are likely to require a car at one or both ends to complete the trip in a reasonable time and with reasonable comfort..”
原因基金会的报告指出的是'的圣旧金山市区（城市化）区的中转市场份额为3.8％ ，洛杉矶是1.6 ％ ，圣迭戈1.2 ％ ，圣何塞0.8％和萨克拉门托0.7 ％ ， “即说：”绝大多数的高铁车次是可能要求在一个汽车或两端完成在合理时间和合理的舒适之旅...... “
1.The rail plan offered an “uninformative timeline” and presented an “inconsistent order of events.”
铁路计划提供了一个“无意义的时间表” ，并提出了一个“不一致的事件顺序。 ”
2.The rail plan contained “no risk management strategy.”For instance, it addressed “the risk of incorrectly forecasted ridership with one sentence,” murkily noting that “the risk “would be mitigated by policies that continue to draw people to reside inCalifornia and encourage high-speed rail as an alternative mode of transportation .’”
铁路计划中包含的“无风险管理策略”，例如，它解决了“不正确地预测了一句乘客的风险， ”穆尔基利指出，“风险” ，将继续吸引人们居住的政策缓解在加利福尼亚州和鼓励作为替代的运输模式的高速铁路。
3.The rail plan did not “provide any numerical ranges nor confidence intervals for projections contained in the plan (such as cost, revenues, or ridership).”Thus , “the risk of not realizing the forecasted ridership, revenues ,or costs is unknown
铁路计划没有提供任何数值范围，也没有计划（如成本，收入，或乘车）中预测的置信区间。“因此， ”没有实现预测的乘客量，收入或费用的风险未知
没有车，它不容易从一个地方到另一个。原因的基础上报告指出
“三藩城市（城市）地区的运输市场份额为3.8%，湖人1.6%，迭戈1.2%，若泽0.8%，沙加缅度0.7%，意指“广大高铁旅行可能需要一个车在一端或两端完成旅行在合理的时间和舒适合理的。”
其他挫折是在一月，当加利福尼亚立法分析师办公室，立法机关的无党派的看门狗，发表评价的高铁局最新的商业计划。它的发现如下：
1。该铁路计划提供了一个“没有时间”，提出了“不一致的事件顺序。”
2。铁路计划包含“无风险管理策略。”例如，它解决了“错误的风险预测工具有一句，“阴郁地指出，“风险”将减轻政策，继续吸引人们居住在加利福尼亚州和鼓励高速铁路作为一种替代交通方式。”
3。铁路计划并没有提供任何数值范围和置信区间预测在计划中（如成本，收入，或乘客）。”因此，“风险未实现预测客流，收入，成本是未知的。
