求助:翻译环境工程专业的英文文献

Abstract
The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter)used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization. Microbiologicalquality was determined by reference to nematode egg content, fecal coliforms, E.coli and somaticcoliphages. Pathogenic nematode eggs were efficiently retained by the macrofiltration systems. However, since othertypes of nematode eggs were present in the effluents treated by both systems, the possibility of such infective agentsappearing after this type of treatment cannot be discounted. The membrane technologies proved highly efficient atretaining micro-organisms, achieving effluents of excellent microbiological quality. However, the effluents could notbe classified as sterile, since contamination of permeation zones gave rise to the presence of micro-organisms. Thisresult casts doubt on the validity of using the fecal coliform indicator to assess microbiological quality of effluents fromthese systems. Differences between the two membrane technologies were noted with regard to viral particle retentioncapacity, with only the ultrafiltration module achieving effluents with total absence of fecal contamination indicators.The macrofiltration systems may present problems when used as pre-treatments to standard disinfection systems (UVradiation, reactive oxidant disinfection). Such problems do not arise with the membrane technologies, which offer avalid alternative for the disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization.
你这也叫翻译,金山词霸谁不会用

摘要: 我们评估被用作预处理和薄膜技术(微孔过滤和超滤)的来自不同的多级过滤系统 (压力沙子过滤器和圆盘过滤器)的污水中微生物的质量,以决定在城市污水回收利用前使用那种消毒方法。微生物的质量由线虫卵、排泄物的大肠菌、大肠杆菌和大肠杆菌噬菌体决定。致病性的线虫卵有效的被多级过滤系统去除
温馨提示:内容为网友见解,仅供参考
第1个回答  2008-03-28
摘要
流出物的微生物学的质量从(压力沙滤器和过滤纸片)使用的不同的macrofiltration系统的,当预处理和膜技术(微细过滤和超过滤)被评估为了确定他们可能的应用作为选择到都市污水的消毒作用在回收利用之前。 Microbiologicalquality取决于在线虫蛋内容、粪便大肠菌、大肠埃希氏菌和somaticcoliphages的参考。 致病性线虫鸡蛋由macrofiltration系统高效率地保留。 然而,因为线虫鸡蛋othertypes是存在两个系统对待的流出物,这样传染性agentsappearing的可能性,在此种治疗不可能被打折之后。 膜技术证明了非常有效率的atretaining的微生物,达到优秀微生物学的质量流出物。 然而,因为渗透过程区域的污秽提升了微生物,出现流出物可能为不育分类的notbe。 Thisresult表示在使用粪便大肠菌显示有效性的怀疑估计流出物fromthese系统的微生物学的质量。 二膜技术之间的区别注意了关于病毒微粒retentioncapacity,当仅超过滤模块达到流出物以总缺乏粪便污秽显示。macrofiltration系统也许提出问题,当使用作为预处理到标准消毒作用系统(UVradiation,易反应的氧化剂消毒作用)。 这样问题不出现与膜技术,在回收利用之前提供都市污水消毒作用的avalid选择。
相似回答