求高手翻译下这段话，不要用软件翻译，急求！在线等！

In recent decades, most countries have initiated telecommunications reforms, with these reform
programs manifesting divergences in approaches. An important reason for this lies in different
motivations shaped by the individual environments of countries. For example, in the United States,
the unofficial status of the AT&T monopoly made it a target for antitrust laws. In consequence,
market change has been consistent, and the US has become a leading country in telecommunications
reform. Moreover, because of the dominant capacity of domestic incumbents, international
competition has also been encouraged to a certain degree (Baliga & Santalainen, 1999). In the UK,
market liberalization was initiated by the government's move to improve the performance of
state-owned enterprises. In contrast, most countries in the EU, while being weary about large
foreign operators entering their markets before domestic operators were ready, and before being
"satisfied" with their universal service, have preferred cautious reforms (Collins & Murroni, 1997;
Finland Ministry, 1996). Expecting to promote their economies by the fast development of telecommunications, some developing countries have adopted radical, excessive changes in telecommunications
through attracting foreign capital (Petrazzini, 1995).

PS:楼上的最后一句，明显是错误的啊~~是through 而不是to attract,所以是通过，而不是目的是吸引外资~~

近几十年来，大多数国家已经开始电信改革，这些改革项目在处理中显示出一些分歧。一个重要的原因在于国家的自身环境形成了不同的动机。例如，在美国，
AT ＆ T垄断的非官方地位使它成为反垄断法的目标。因此，市场变化始终向同化发展的，美国已成为电信改革方面处于领先的国家。此外，由于国内执政者统治的能力，国际竞争也在一定程度上被鼓励（ Baliga ＆ Santalainen ， 1999年） 。在英国， 市场自由化是政府发起的，以改善国有企业的业绩。与此相反，在欧盟大多数国家，都在厌倦着大的外国运营商在国内运营商准备好前进入他们的市场，以及在“满足”他们的全球服务前，更偏好谨慎改革（柯林斯＆ Murroni ， 1997年; 芬兰外交部， 1996年） 。为乐用快速发展的电信以促进其经济，一些发展中国家通过吸引国外资本采取激进的、过多的变化。
Petrazzini ， 1995年） 。

温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考

当前网址：https://11.t2y.org/zz/mfm8qs74.html