请各位高手帮忙把以下几段英文翻译成中文！谢谢！

（1）Consumers may often be asked to sign contracts that contain a myriad of fine-print provisions,many of which are quite harsh.For example, a price-adjustment clause may increase the price of a car over the contract price before delivery, or a waiver clause may surrender the consumer's rights to resist the entering of a legal judgment against him upon default of an installment payment.Most consumers signing such contracts are unaware of the existence of the legal effect of such clauses.Some courts have refused to enforce them on the theory that they were not really communicated to the consumer。
（2）Typical of the application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel in limiting the right to revoke an offer is the situation that arises between a general building contractor and various subcontractors.The general contractor requests bids (offers) from potential subcontractors who would do heating, plumbing, electrical, and carpentry work on a building owner.The general contractor relies on some of these bids in making its own bid to the building owner.Then the general contractor finds that the building owner has accepted its offer to do the required work.Before the general contractor`s bid (offer) is accepted, it is revoked by the subcontractor.The following case exemplifies the resolution of such a problem and the court`s limitation of the right to revoke an offer.
（3）If the offer does not require the offeree to use a specific means of communication, problems can arise concerning the time at which an acceptance by an offeree would be effective. While the time of acceptance is not critical to most contracts, where the offeror has attempted a revocation or where the intended acceptance is delayed or lost, an analysis of the method or time of acceptance is necessary.

（4）However, the rule that courts will refrain form inquiring into the adequacy of consideration assumes that the parties have freely entered into their agreement. Where this assumption is questioned,the courts will take into account the adequacy of the consideration, duress, undue influence, or mistake, a court will examine the adequacy of the consideration as evidence of the existence of those factors.

（1）消费者通常会被要求签署的合同包含无数的罚款印刷的规定，其中许多是相当harsh.For例如，一个价格调整的条款可能会增加对合同价格交货前的一辆汽车的价格，或者放弃条款可能交出消费者权益，抵制对他分期付款后payment.Most消费者签订这类合同违约的法律判决进入属于此类clauses.Some法院法律效力的存在不知道拒绝执行他们的，他们没有真正传达给消费者的理论。
（2）的允诺禁反言原则的适用限制的典型有权撤销要约的情况与一般建筑承建商和各种subcontractors.The总承包商要求投标（提供从潜在的分包商）谁加热时会做，管道，电力，建筑和木工owner.The总承包商在作出自己的出价提高到owner.Then建设总承包商的一些依赖这些出价认为，楼宇业主在接受其提供所需做的工作。前总承包商单曲出价（提供）被接受，它是由subcontractor.The下列案件撤销反映了这样一个问题的解决和法院单曲的权利，撤销要约的限制。
（3）如果不要求提供受要约使用沟通的具体手段，就可能会出现问题的时刻了一个要约的接受将有效。虽然时间不接受关键多数合同，在要约人曾试图撤销或拟接受的延误或丢失，一个方法或接受时间的分析是必要的。

（4）但是，规则，法院将避免形成考虑到充足的查询假设双方自愿到他们的协议。如果这种假设提出质疑，法院将考虑代价，胁迫，不当影响，或错误充足，法院将审查作为对这些因素的存在证据是否充分的考虑。

200fen

温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考

当前网址：https://11.t2y.org/zz/fp88svpvq.html