中文：
不应该，因为如果死刑废除了，就会有更多的人杀人，像美国，一连杀7、8个人的有的是，我们有没有枪，还用活吗？而且这也不符合中国人。
所以不应该。
English:
Should not, because if the death penalty repealed, there will be more people kill, as the americans, for kill 7, 8 individuals, we have plenty of gun, from living? And it also does not accord with Chinese debt money, and kill for a life of psychological habits.
So should not。
楼主选我 偶
上面是反方
正方
一定要，因为废除死刑是人道主义的体现，几乎所有的国家都废除了死刑。我们也要与时俱进，何况中国人欠债花钱，杀人偿命的心理习惯是严重错误的。这样会多增加一个家庭的痛苦，所以一定要。
Must, because to abolish the death penalty is the embodiment of the humanitarian, almost all of the countries have abolished the death penalty. We also want to keep pace with The Times, how much more will the Chinese spend money, kill people for a life in the psychological habits is a serious mistake. This will increase a family of pain, so be sure to.
不容易啊楼主追问
不应该，因为如果死刑废除了，就会有更多的人杀人，像美国，一连杀7、8个人的有的是，我们有没有枪，还用活吗？而且这也不符合中国人。
所以不应该。
English:
Should not, because if the death penalty repealed, there will be more people kill, as the americans, for kill 7, 8 individuals, we have plenty of gun, from living? And it also does not accord with Chinese debt money, and kill for a life of psychological habits.
So should not。
楼主选我 偶
上面是反方
正方
一定要，因为废除死刑是人道主义的体现，几乎所有的国家都废除了死刑。我们也要与时俱进，何况中国人欠债花钱，杀人偿命的心理习惯是严重错误的。这样会多增加一个家庭的痛苦，所以一定要。
Must, because to abolish the death penalty is the embodiment of the humanitarian, almost all of the countries have abolished the death penalty. We also want to keep pace with The Times, how much more will the Chinese spend money, kill people for a life in the psychological habits is a serious mistake. This will increase a family of pain, so be sure to.
不容易啊楼主追问
反方的有没有再多一点哈~数量不够说撒~
参考资料：自己的大脑
温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考
无其他回答
相似回答
大家正在搜
