In the international marine goods traffic practice, according to the voyage number charter party signing and issuing bill of lading, usually includes the use simple expression to cite the charter party content the provision, this is in the bill of lading merges the provision. Its potency involves directly to the bill of lading relations side benefit. But our country "Maritime law" only then merged the provision in 95th to the bill of lading to make the principled stipulation, in the legislation has had the flaw obviously, also caused in the judicial practice to concern this kind of case not to be able to obtain the very good solution. Therefore the author suggested that "Maritime law" should profit from the overseas related legislation experience, merges the stipulation which to the bill of lading the provision the potency question is clear, reduces in the practice to concern this kind of case's dispute, and under the maintenance national interest's premise, in the unified judicial practice makes the law.
或者
Carriage of Goods by Sea in the international practice, issued under the voyage charter party bill of lading, usually containing the use of simple language to invoke the provisions of a charter contract, which is incorporated into the provisions of the bill of lading. Its effect directly relates to the relationship between the interests of the bill of lading. But China's "maritime law" only in the first 95 pairs of the bill of lading incorporated the terms of the provisions made in principle, the legislature is obviously flawed, but also led to the judicial practice in such cases should not be a good solution.The author therefore recommends that "maritime law" should learn from foreign experience in the relevant legislation, the bill of lading incorporated the terms of the validity of specific provisions to be in order to reduce the practice of such controversial cases, and in the maintenance of national interests under the premise of a unified judicial practice, practice.
温馨提示:内容为网友见解,仅供参考