Question: Someone maintains that college
should teach knowledge about future jobs, while others argue that students
should learn what they are interested. What is your opinion?
Colleges are now facing the problems, for
they do not know what they should do to effectively teach the students. While some
of the people announce that college should pay attention mainly in developing
students’ interests, other citizens proclaim that universities should
concentrate on the specific knowledge about the coming jobs. However, in my
opinion promoting individual’s for their future occupation is the priority of
each college to ponder.
As college should be humanized, students’
uniqueness is supposed to be encouraged. Therefore, as one of the main derivations
of specificity, individuals’ interests should be concentrated first. Besides,
well- developed interests that individuals possessed could enormously drive the
students to conquer the obstacles they will encounter in the future due to the
supplications of interests-confidence and courage. Furthermore, interests allow
students to achieve their potential and to conduct to all-round development. These
three reasons prove the profession that universities should allow students to
learn what they are interested in.
However, the people who are in favor of
opposing arguments proclaim that the society we live today is unprecedentedly turbulent
and cruel. The amount of unemployment has soared to a high level which demonstrates
the difficulties and the risks students will face and take in the future. More and
more people have already obliged to change their dreams and interests to adapt
to the society. Therefore, college could not mainly focus on the interests of individuals,
but prior teaching specific jobs’ professional knowledge to the first place.
By considering both sides’ arguments, in my
opinion, colleges should rise and enhance individuals’ interests to their
future occupation, which could successfully allow them to be more competitive
in the future.
这个排版…… 很坑爹希望大神们不要介意,拷到word里面看吧~~~
7.5的话我觉得应该是高了很多,但是应该过6的关卡问题不大了把?
追答语法没有毛病,意思没有错误,6分我觉得没有问题的
追问那么这个我想表示把他放在首位的话应该怎么说呢?prior其实是个副词……不能这样用的
追答give privilege to
或者是
put it to the first place
那么这个我想表示把他放在首位的话应该怎么说呢?还有就是这篇文章是让你讨论两方的观点这种情况也需要一方over另外一方么?您能不能给我你的QQ号码?
追答题目是What is your opinion?所以一般是提出偏向一方。如果只是discuss the both你可以给观点也可以不给。但是一般人都会给一个吧,这样也好写一些。
give first priority to